CHANGE REQUEST

Request identity number:
C00036

Applies to:
S00059, S00060, S00061, S00062, S00063, S00064, S00065, S00066, S00067, S00069, S00070, S00071, S00072, S00073, S00074, S00075, S00076, S00077, S00078, S00079, S00080, S00107

Type of request:
Editorial

Request status level:
Resolved

Proposal:
Validation of IEC 60617-02-01...-02 after loading into the database.

Reason:
Transfer of information from the printed publication IEC 60617-02 Ed. 2 into the IEC 60617 datbase.

Requested by:


TC3

General comments:

Comments at evaluation:
No comments.

Comments at validation:
JP(HIKE): Graphical symbols S00059...S00066 are "symbols elements" used for "outlines and enclosures." These keywords should appear in each usage field. (Secretary's note: Outlines and enclosures are already used as keywords. S00059 to S00061 are strictly speaking not symbols elements although they appear under this heading. No change.)

JP(HIKE): Symbols S00062 and S00062, unnecesary new-lines and hyphonation should be deleted from description. (Secretary's note: I don't find anything, a transient error??)

JP(HIKE): Symbol S00064, M=2,5 mm grid is missing, also in the paper version. (Secretary's note: A grid has been added. At the same time the appearence has been modified to that of Ed. 1, i.e. it is a real dash-dotted line. This gives also more sense to the application notes.)

JP(HIKE): Symbols S00067,S00073...S00080 and S00107 are "qualifying symbols used for "kind of current and voltage." These keywords should appear in each usage field. (Secretary's note: "Kind of current and voltage" is added as keyword, not in usage. The usage field is intended as a field for other possible names under which the object might be known, without being synonyms in the usual sense.)

JP(HIKE): Symbol S00067, the graphical symbol is different from the paper version of IEC 60617 Ed.2, whereas it is the same as the paper version of IEC 617 Ed.1. Is current electronic version correct? (Secretary's note: Yes it is. See "Discussion of S00067.pdf below.)

JP(HIKE): Symbols S00074 and S00075 will be alternative forms deviated from S00073. Symbols S00073...S00075 should be used together to compare frequency ranges. In this way one can distinguish between S00073 from S000107. (Secretary's note: To emphisize this I have modified the text of the application note in such a way that it is clear that these three symbols have to be used in the same context.)

JP(HIKE): Symbol S00076 is the same as the paper version of IEC 60617 Ed.2, but different from the paper version of IEC 617 Ed.1. Is it intentionally changed from Ed.1? Do we need to change back to the symbol of Ed.1 to be consistent with S00067? (Secretary's note: the graphical symbol has been modified to show three lines, i.e. the same as in Ed. 1. See also document "Discussion of S00067.pdf" below.)

AT(WGAS): Symbol S00073 and S00107 are equal. (Secretary's note: See comment above.)

Voting at validation:
Closing date for validation: 2000-05-06.

JP(HIKE): Symbols S00059...S00066, YES
JP(HIKE): Symbol S00067, NO (Changed to YES. See document "Discussion of S00067.pdf below.)
JP(HIKE): Symbols S00069...S00080 and S00107, YES
AT(WGAS): Symbols S00059 - S00067, S00069 - S00080, S00107, Yes (see also comments)

The symbols have been released with the modifications indicated above.

Requested on:
2000-04-17

Evaluated on:
2000-04-17

Resolved on:
2000-07-05

Withdrawn on:

Evaluation closing on:

Validation closing on:
File Attachment Icon
Discussion of S00067.pdf