CHANGE REQUEST |
Request identity number: |
C00072 |
Applies to: |
S00815, S00816, S00817, S00822, S00879 |
Type of request: |
Technical modification |
Request status level: |
Resolved |
Proposal: |
S00815, S00816 and S00817: Withdraw these symbols, since they show constructional details.
Instead of references to these symbols, make a reference ot S00583.
Note that C00065 contains the proposal to include a new application note to S00583 that the number of half-circles may be adapted to suit the application.
S00822: Withdraw this symbol, because it is technically obsolete.
S00879: Change the graphics to use four half-circles instead of two. It then becomes application of S00842.
A00128: Withdraw this application note.
|
Reason: |
This is part of the TaskII proposals for IEC 60617 Part 6. For reference purposes TaskII-Part6(commented).pdf is attached below.
|
Requested by: |
TC3 Secretary
per-ake.svensson@se.abb.com
TC3 |
General comments: |
|
Comments at evaluation: |
Submitted for evaluation 2001-10-25. Closing for evaluation 2001-11-23.
DK(KATH): Agree with the proposals. Proceed with the normal data base procedure.
AT(WGAS): I Agree to withdraw the symbols S00815, S00816 and S00822. What is the proposal for S00213? (Secretary's note: It is an error. It is taken away now.)
DE(RESC): I agree for normal database procedure.
NO(ES): S00815, S00816, S00817: Agree to withdraw.
S00822: The symbol is probably not much used. However, if hand-driven generators are to be shown, this is the symbol to be used. (Secretary's note: The meaning of "Withdrawal" is now explained in the "General description", and it will in this case be added in the remark to the symbol S00822 that it is withdrawn because it is considered technically obsolete.)
S00879: When changing the graphics to four half-circles, the graphics becomes identical to S00842. (Secretary's note: Yes, but teh concepts are not idenical.)
A00128: This note can be kept, especially considering the change request C00065. (Secretary's note: I agree that with the note added to S00583 because of C00065, it could be kept.)
S00213 is a wrong reference to this change request ? (Yes)
Conclusion by the Secretary: The change request is submitted for validation, with the change that A00128 is proposed to be kept. |
Comments at validation: |
Submitted for validation 2001-12-05. Closing for validation 2002-01-18.
DE(RESC): I see no reason to change S00879 and the relevant application note. I say leave it as it is! |
Voting at validation: |
FI(TAVI): YES
AT(WGAS): Yes to withdraw
DE(RESC): YES to withdraw symbols S00815; 16; 17 and 22. NO to withdraw symbol S00879.
DK(KATH): YES
CN(GUTI): YES
Conclusion by the Secretary: The proposal is accepted and will be released. |
Requested on: |
2001-10-23 |
Evaluated on: |
2001-12-05 |
Resolved on: |
2002-01-27 |
Withdrawn on: |
|
Evaluation closing on: |
|
Validation closing on: |
|